Demo Mode — Exploring the Widget Assembly Line. All analysis tools available (read-only).
Sign Up Free Exit Demo

Widget Assembly Line — Current State

Current State

Acme Manufacturing Pty Ltd — electromechanical widget assembly line. Takt time 2.1 hrs/unit based on 420 units/month demand. Bottleneck at CNC Machining driving excess WIP and long lead time.

Import / Export

Templates

Recording Runs

Loading runs...

No recording runs yet.

Use the recorder or mobile app to capture timing data.

Lead Time

Total elapsed time from the first step to the last, including all working time and waiting time. This is what the customer experiences.

Cycle Time

The sum of actual working time across all steps. Does not include waiting between steps.

Wait Time

Total time spent waiting between steps — queues, approvals, handoffs. Often the biggest improvement opportunity.

PCE

Valuable time divided by total lead time. World-class is 25-50%. Most processes start at 1-10%.

VA Ratio

Percentage of steps classified as valuable. A high ratio with low PCE means your valuable steps have too much waiting between them.

Bottleneck

The step with the longest cycle time — it constrains the throughput of the entire process. Improving this step has the biggest impact.

Lead Time

48.08h

Cycle Time

7.83h

Wait Time

40.25h

PCE

11.4%

VA Ratio

11.4%

Bottleneck

Outbound Shipping

Wait 24.0h
Cycle 0.33h

Work Type Breakdown

Valuable 70.2% (5.5h)
Incidental 25.5% (2.0h)
Waste 4.3% (0.33h)

Process Timeline

Value-Add vs Non-Value-Add

Bottleneck Analysis

Stage Efficiency

Takt Time Analysis

Takt Time : 0.8h 5 balanced 3 overloaded

Activity Classification: Valuable / Incidental / Waste

Valuable (V)

An activity is valuable if it meets all three criteria:

  • The customer is willing to pay for it
  • It transforms the product or service
  • It is done right the first time

Examples: Assembly, diagnosis, treatment, coding, machining

Incidental (I)

Necessary for the process but does not add customer value. Target: reduce.

  • Compliance — regulatory checks, audits
  • Setup — machine changeovers, calibration
  • Inspection — quality checks, testing
  • Transport — moving materials between stations
  • Documentation — required paperwork, logging

Examples: Safety inspection, staging, labelling, dispatch

Waste (W)

No value to anyone — should be eliminated.

  • Waiting — queues, approvals, batching delays
  • Rework — correcting defects or errors
  • Overproduction — making more than needed
  • Motion — unnecessary movement of people
  • Over-processing — doing more than required

Examples: Waiting room, rework loop, idle storage, unnecessary handling

Process Stages

# Stage Observed (h) Rating Std Time (h) Wait (h) Invalid (h) Type Resource Notes Actions
Loading history...

Min Cycle

Max Cycle

Avg Cycle

Median Cycle

Cycle Time Trend

Recording History

No recordings yet for this stage.

Loading history...

Min Cycle

Max Cycle

Avg Cycle

Median Cycle

Cycle Time Trend

Recording History

No recordings yet for this stage.

Loading history...

Min Cycle

Max Cycle

Avg Cycle

Median Cycle

Cycle Time Trend

Recording History

No recordings yet for this stage.

Loading history...

Min Cycle

Max Cycle

Avg Cycle

Median Cycle

Cycle Time Trend

Recording History

No recordings yet for this stage.

Loading history...

Min Cycle

Max Cycle

Avg Cycle

Median Cycle

Cycle Time Trend

Recording History

No recordings yet for this stage.

Loading history...

Min Cycle

Max Cycle

Avg Cycle

Median Cycle

Cycle Time Trend

Recording History

No recordings yet for this stage.

Loading history...

Min Cycle

Max Cycle

Avg Cycle

Median Cycle

Cycle Time Trend

Recording History

No recordings yet for this stage.

Loading history...

Min Cycle

Max Cycle

Avg Cycle

Median Cycle

Cycle Time Trend

Recording History

No recordings yet for this stage.

Reorder: use up/down arrows on each row, or drag to reorder.

1. Raw Material Receiving
2. CNC Machining
3. Sub-Assembly
4. Quality Inspection
5. Main Assembly
6. Functional Testing
7. Packaging
8. Outbound Shipping

Resources

Assembly Tech
CNC Operator
Logistics
Packer
QC Inspector
Senior Assembler
Stores Clerk
Test Tech

Analysis Detail

# Stage Cycle (h) Wait (h) Type Resource Defect % Efficiency Cumulative
1 Raw Material Receiving 0.5 8.0 I Stores Clerk 0.0% 5.9% 8.5h
2 CNC Machining 2.5 4.0 V CNC Operator 1.8% 38.5% 15.0h
3 Sub-Assembly 1.2 1.0 V Assembly Tech 0.5% 54.5% 17.2h
4 Quality Inspection 0.75 0.5 I QC Inspector 0.0% 60.0% 18.45h
5 Main Assembly 1.8 0.5 V Senior Assembler 1.0% 78.3% 20.75h
6 Functional Testing 0.5 2.0 I Test Tech 3.2% 20.0% 23.25h
7 Packaging 0.25 0.25 I Packer 0.0% 50.0% 23.75h
8 Outbound Shipping 0.33 24.0 W Logistics 0.0% 1.4% 48.08h

Improvement Opportunities

Raw Material Receiving

  • Low efficiency (5.9%) — below 50.0% target

CNC Machining

  • Low efficiency (38.5%) — below 50.0% target

Quality Inspection

  • Incidental stage with significant cycle time — reduce or automate

Functional Testing

  • Low efficiency (20.0%) — below 50.0% target

Outbound Shipping

  • Low efficiency (1.4%) — below 50.0% target

Smart Suggestions

Waiting dominates your lead time

High Impact reduce

84% of your lead time is spent waiting. Focus on flow: reduce batch sizes, eliminate approval queues, implement pull systems, and consider single-piece flow where possible.

Bottleneck at Outbound Shipping

High Impact parallelize

Wait time at 'Outbound Shipping' is 24.0h — more than 3x the average wait of 5.0h. Consider adding capacity, splitting the step, or processing in parallel.

Outbound Shipping

Excessive waiting at Raw Material Receiving

Medium Impact reduce

'Raw Material Receiving' spends more time waiting (8.0h) than working (0.5h). Investigate approval delays, batch processing, or resource availability.

Raw Material Receiving

Excessive waiting at CNC Machining

Medium Impact reduce

'CNC Machining' spends more time waiting (4.0h) than working (2.5h). Investigate approval delays, batch processing, or resource availability.

CNC Machining

Excessive waiting at Functional Testing

Medium Impact reduce

'Functional Testing' spends more time waiting (2.0h) than working (0.5h). Investigate approval delays, batch processing, or resource availability.

Functional Testing

Excessive waiting at Outbound Shipping

Medium Impact reduce

'Outbound Shipping' spends more time waiting (24.0h) than working (0.33h). Investigate approval delays, batch processing, or resource availability.

Outbound Shipping

3 consecutive non-value-add stages detected

Medium Impact eliminate

Stages Functional Testing, Packaging, Outbound Shipping are all non-value-add and occur in sequence. Consider eliminating, combining, or automating these steps.

Functional Testing Packaging Outbound Shipping

Flag Process Change

Stage:

Save as Template

Save this map's current stages as a reusable template.